In which of the following cases it was held that the preamble to the Constitution is an integral and operative part of the constitution?

Question

Accepted Answer

(d) Keshavanand Bharti v. State of Kerala — In the case of Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (1973 SC), the Supreme Court held that the preamble is an integral and functional part of the Constitution, and overturned the decision given in the Re-Berubari's case (preamble is the key to the constitution but not a part of it). • In the of Minerva Mills VS Union of India (1980 SC). It was held that sub-sections (4) and (5) of Article 368 are unconstitutional because they destroy the basic structure of the constitution. • In the case of Golaknath VS State of Punjab (1971 SC). It was held that the power to amend the constitution is contained in Article 368. This article provides for the procedure of amendment and not the power. Amendment is a legislative process. The word law used in Article 13 includes all kinds of laws, statutory as well as constitution law. Indian Constitution and Governance

Answer

(A) Minerva Mills case

Answer

(B) Re Berubari's case

Answer

(C) Golaknath v. State of Punjab

In which of the following cases it was held that the preamble to the Constitution is an integral and operative part of the constitution?

Asked in

Related questions